Tag Archives: Mnangagwa

Remembering Zimbabwe’s 2017 coup: Jonathan Moyo’s COMING out

12 Nov

So, Jonathan Moyo finally “came out” in Alex Magaisa’s BSR on Sunday, 11 November. There have been mixed reactions with some applauding the interview and others castigating the former Minister for all sorts of reasons. Mine is not to judge the BSR because I think Alex has an important role to play inJM terms of information dissemination and analysis of the Zimbabwe political arena. What I have issues with is the content of Jonathan Moyo’s responses. Crass, arrogant, seemingly invincible, unrepentant, manipulating and devoid of hunhu (morals and ethics) is a bevy of words that I could only think of to describe his responses in that interview.

Jonathan Moyo wants to portray a picture of being invincible when he is asked whether Mugabe knew about the coup and failed to prevent it. He says Mugabe knew about but did not think that Mnangagwa and Chiwenga would pull it off. That is his opinion, but I think the truth of the matter is that Mugabe knew he was finished and there was nothing he could do about it. Neither could Mugabe’s lieutenants do anything either. If they could, then they were sloppy. The other side of the story told by the coup plotters paints a picture that they were resisted but they triumphed leading to the attacks and killings that happened on the coup day and soon after. It is not news also that there are stories of the police led by Augustine Chihuri trying to effect an ambush arrest on Chiwenga on his return from a trip to China. If that was not resistance from Mugabe, then I am Moses from the Bible. Jonathan Moyo wants people to read a picture that Mugabe and his acolytes were and are invincible. The coup came, and it happened, the rest is history.

Jonathan Moyo has a history of arrogance and spewing trash whenever he opens his mouth. Whenever he says “with all due respect” in the interview you can expect to receive a barrage of verbal munitions from him. He rightly argues that it is his inalienable right to join a political party of his choice and no one should or has qualms with that. What is problematic though and what I find arrogant is the way he wants to behave as if he is the only person who appreciates that he must be allowed to join any grouping of his choice. We all have that inalienable right, what is problematic though is saying you are principled and then you sup with the devil under the guise that you want to “reform them within”. That is pure nonsense!

Then there is the issue of a grown man who lacks “hunhu” or ubuntu as they would say. He mentions that Mugabe did not respect him when it came to the issue of the coup and information about Chiwenga and Mnangagwa. So, if Mugabe did not respect him with that issue, what else did he not pay attention to when Jonathan Moyo engaged him? If he did not command that kind of respect from Mugabe why did he then stay on in such an environment? Jonathan stayed in there with the coup plotters who he says he was “very close to” and also those with the fake PHDs that tried to “decimate” the coup plotters. He wants to play victim but this guy, this man, this Professor lacks morals. Haatorina hunhu and that is why he stayed and supped with these people he complains about today when they didn’t respect him and even wanted to kill him.

Jonathan Moyo talks about amending the ZANU PF constitution, but you can see from between the lines that whatever they were doing it was ultimately meant to change the Zimbabwe constitution and political arena. The idea of amending the ZANU PF constitution was for him a way to get his gang of Four into the presidium but he failed to see that the coup plotters had the same line of thinking albeit for a different person. He is not being sincere with the truth and s being too economical with his words on why Mnangagwa tricked him on the constitution and why Chiwenga as now know towing him and telling to defer to “Shumba”. Jonathan was outwitted by the coup plotters and he didn’t see it coming because he had set his mind on an Oppah Vice Presidency.

Jonathan Moyo is an opportunist who tried his luck with Sydney Sekermayi and it backfired. He laments that Sekeramayi did not bite the bait. But for God’s sake, mdara Sydney is past his sell by date. He is old and would not have changed Zimbabwe’s fortunes by even a dint. What Jonathan Moyo says about Sydney Sekeramayi sells out his hypocrisy and opportunism in ZANU PF’s politics. He on one end tries to sell a Generation 40 gimmick which was all a ruse to get his gang of Kasukuwere, Zhuwao and the motormouth Grace into Government but with the protection of the old guard. It failed, the other geezers saw it and they stopped it right in its tracks. Still Jonathan Moyo thinks he had a bright idea. What rubbish!

Jonathan Moyo talks about his father, he mentions Gukurahundi and how the military tried to murder him. All these issues put together do not speak to each other one bit. What he reveals is someone who has failed dismally to choose his battles and which side to fight from. He smacks of a person who sheds tears with one eye and the other one wide open smiling at ZIMDEF as he is accused.

Jonathan Moyo speaks of the Men and Women of Letters. He surrounded himself with those who have never read at all like Grace Mugabe and he was comfortable with the arrangement. The crass behaviour he tries to present here by defending Grace Mugabe is abominable. He was close to her and they worked on the Interface rallies together. One mind thinks that he was the brains behind what Grace Mugabe did but unfortunately that one was just too thick to learn anything. You could tell from the way she used to mix Shona and English with that fake accent and it always was going to be a big disaster. Jonathan Moyo tries too hard to sell ZANU PF’s internal problems as a national issue. It will never fly.

Next time we would want to hear more stories about the disappearance of Itai Dzamara; how and where Jonathan Moyo got money to survive in the crazy Zimbabwe economy;  what happened to the Daily News when it was bombed; how much money he was paid to do all the work for ZANU PF etc. He is a part of the mess that Zimbabwe finds itself in today and cannot try to avoid censure, blame or questions.

The BSR has done well to start these conversations. We now await to see what will be in Jonathan Moyo’s memoirs and the letters to his father. He just better be careful not to dance on his father’s grave with letters full of hypocrisy, lies, deceit and unethical banter not fit conversations between father and son.

Image

Robert Gabriel Mugabe must go by any means but Military rule in Zimbabwe is a No – No!

16 Nov

 

Zimbabwe woke up to the mugabe go home and restnews of a “coup” on Wednesday 15 November 2017. The Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA) is refusing to call this action a coup. The African Union and SADC say they are still assessing the situation. What is clear for me however is that this action led by General Constantino Guveya Chiwenga was a coup against the government of geriatric ZANU PF leader, Robert Gabriel Mugabe. I am more than excited at the removal of Robert Mugabe and will not hide it. However, I refuse to be cajoled or convinced that the actions taken by Mnangagwa and Chiwenga are for Zimbabwe’s good. As Oliver Mtukudzi sings “ngoromera ingoromera chete, harina zvarinoshanda, haringabatsire” ZANU PF and its cohorts in the police, army and intelligence are a violent lot. Violence is violence, no matter what it is supposed to achieve. This is how ZANU PF has managed to lead Zimbabwe up to this far with disastrous consequences. The coup is for all intents and purposes an internal ZANU PF succession problem which must not be given a national status. It is what it is and a spade must be called a spade. Mugabe must go but the idea of a military takeover in Zimbabwe must never be entertained.

Robert Gabriel Mugabe removal most welcome

The removal of RGM from the Presidency of Zimbabwe is the most welcome news anyone would wish for in Zimbabwe. The man has tormented Zimbabweans for ages and the fact that he has reached his twilight without sorting out his succession has now become a threat to Zimbabwe. However, this dilemma must not and never be interpreted by ZANU PF supporters who are jostling to succeed him as something that is common between them and all of Zimbabwe. The Lacoste faction and the ZNA have a different agenda and Zimbabweans at large have another for his demise. The Lacoste group that wants him out is doing so because they have been sidelined from Robert Mugabe’s patronage leadership of plunder, kleptocracy, and national plunder, where they benefited immensely. For the ordinary Zimbabwean, the need to have Mugabe off the Presidential seat is to end the proposed dynastic rule through his wife Grace Mugabe, state sponsored human rights violations as well as being rescued from the jaws of the debilitating economic decline among other things.

Mugabe must just go. There must be no doubt in anyone’s mind. The old man just needs to go – where he goes and how he goes is really none of anyone’s business.

Mugabe’s succession is an internal political party problem

Every Zimbabwean saw what has happened in ZANU PF coming. It was only going to be a matter of time. The jostling between the two ZANU PF factions of Lacoste and G40 was always going to be a do or die encounter for the two groupings. Robert Mugabe delayed his succession to his own peril. The toxic choice to have his dull, dumb wit, fake PHD wife, Grace Mugabe as his successor was just what the doctor ordered for his opponents. This was never going to fly and very soon it had to be thwarted somehow.

My challenge with this whole matter is the apportioning of a national brand that the military and Lacoste faction in ZANU PF are trying to give to their coup. The succession issue in ZANU PF is not a national “Zimbabwe” problem. Of course, Mugabe’s replacement and stay in power has national consequences but the replacement of the geriatric at the ZANU PF level is an internal political matter and it should stay there.

Robert Mugabe fired Mnangagwa and several of his acolytes in the Lacoste faction according to their party rules and regulations. Whether the process was fair or not was for them to deal with internally or even take to the Zimbabwean domestic courts for adjudication. Mugabe’s succession in ZANU PF is not a national problem the ZNA or the Lacoste faction would want the whole of Zimbabwe to be seized with.

Chiwenga is part of the factional successionist politics in ZANU PF

Those in the know and who have followed Zimbabwe politics will note that the Army General has always exhibited signs and interests in the governance of the country. From rumors that he had a car with plates labelled #Zim2 after Robert Mugabe’s Zim 1, and to the fact that he is highly linked to the Lacoste faction led by Mnangagwa – the evidence is written all over the place. The General from his actions cannot be said to be neutral. He is heavily involved in the successionist politics bedeviling Mugabe and ZANU PF and he is a major and interested player with lots to benefit.

Moreover, Chiwenga’s statement last Tuesday betrays him. The man talks about “the criminals” around Mugabe betraying the revolutionary values of the liberation war and ZANU PF. He talks as if the ZANU PF values are shared national values. That cannot be true. If anyone should be accused of betraying their own ZANU PF values it should be him and his acolytes as they have managed to prop up Robert Mugabe’s regime for years after his hands down defeat by Morgan Tsvangirai in 2008.

If at all the Lacoste faction led by Mnangagwa feels aggrieved by their ouster by Robert Mugabe, they should have left ZANU PF to form their own party as Mugabe intimated in one of their so-called youth Interface rallies. Mnangagwa and his acolytes chose another way and they decided to use the military route.

Furthermore, If Mnangagwa, Chiwenga and his Lacoste are of the view that they have been mistreated by Robert Mugabe and his G40 cabal, then they must deal with them decisively by openly challenging him and deposing him in ZANU PF. They should take charge of ZANU PF completely but never and not in any way try to sell this “National Democratic Project” ruse to the whole of Zimbabwe. The revival of ZANU PF cannot certainly be a national democratic project. ZANU PF is not Zimbabwe and neither is Zimbabwe equal to ZANU PF.

Whatever sentiments are being shared now by this Lacoste group, they cannot be deemed national. They are partisan interests being peddled by a group of ZANU PF members either civilian or in the Zimbabwean military or security forces who had been taken off the “feeding trough” by Robert Mugabe, his wife and the G40 faction.

The African Union and SADC stance on the coup puts Chiwenga and Mnangagwa in a catch 22 situation

It is well known that the African Union and SADC will not recognize coups in the region. This has been the norm and it is not likely to change because of Zimbabwe. To acknowledge and accept this coup would present a dangerous precedent for the rest of Africa and Southern Africa specifically.

Zimbabwean commentators have been noting since the coup that they will not accept any interventions or deals from Zuma, SADC or the AU for Mugabe to stay on. This is fair and fine. However, the ZNA through Chiwenga knows better. Chiwenga knows bitterly well that if he in is military fatigues he will not be accepted as a Zimbabwean political leader. His actions and the statements from the army are quite telling of a man and strategy that the army will not attempt the strategy of slipping into Mugabe’s shoes. If they had the wherewithal they would have been violent. But they cannot. It will taint them, so they will not use the army against the people nor their opponents in G40.

The civilian face of Lacoste, Emmerson Mnangagwa also knows too well that internationally and at a local level he will face serious challenges being recognized as the new President of Zimbabwe. He was fired in his own party by Robert Mugabe without a fight – being brought back by the gun will mean that he will have to sustain his rule by the gun. Of course, he could carry on but that would not augur well for him internationally and at home. Zimbabwe did not elect him, so why would anyone outside his Lacoste faction recognize him as the bonafide President of Zimbabwe? If he takes by force without going through an extraordinary ZANU PF Congress he will forever be remembered as the weak ZANU PF leader who got to the Presidency through the back door and by the gun. “Akapinzwa nekumashure”. I’m sure he doesn’t want that tag either.

Whether South Africa through Zuma, and SADC as well as the AU intervene or not is one thing. What is clear though is that any leader emerging from the coup process will not receive the required international recognition in Zimbabwe, the region, Africa and the whole world.

I have mentioned earlier that the Robert Mugabe succession debacle is an internal ZANU PF matter. If Chiwenga and Mnangagwa want to have their way and be respected at least on face value by SADC and the AU they must depose Robert Mugabe from his seat in ZANU PF and then find a way to the top constitutionally but coming from ZANU PF. Otherwise this whole circus will just leave them stranded with Mugabe, G 40 and Grace Mugabe having the last laugh.

Transitional Government or not – what way for the opposition?

Talk and rumors about a transitional government have continued throughout this whole period. There is nothing new about this proposition. It has been there ever since the Zimbabwe crisis in whatever form started.

My take is that the opposition was ready to meet Mugabe in an election in 2018 with or without an interim joint government as well as no new electoral reforms. So, what has changed today? The situation is different today but it does not warrant opportunistic behavior to want to jump into bed with the enemy especially for the opposition. This is a recipe for disaster akin to the Thabo Mbeki brokered 2008 Government of National Unity days. The most likely outcome of this charade would be a delay in elections, huge budgets and unnecessary prolongation of ZANU PF’s hold on power. Clearly unnecessary!

I do not support the idea of a coalition/interim government.

People who were not elected into office should not lead government in Zimbabwe.

It is nonsensical and purely opportunistic to want to argue that Joice Mujuru, Morgan Tsvangirai or even Dumiso Dabengwa or any other political leader who is out of government now should get into such a formation. It is akin to this rhetoric that anything other than Robert Mugabe is acceptable. No! Zimbabweans must be principled and know what type pf leadership they want. The idea of “Anything and anyone that can walk and talk” is not going to fly Comrades!

If at all Zimbabwe should get to the extent of forming that highly undesirable settlement called the interim/coalition government then the political parties in Parliament should nominate representatives from their sitting MPs. I’m sure they would be capable enough to negotiate the terms of a new transitional process leading to new democratic elections.

The way forward

As I mentioned earlier, while the Robert Mugabe succession matter has some national consequences it clearly is an internal political party debacle within ZANU PF. To want to give this matter a national status is akin to elevating the charlatans in ZANU PF to unnecessary levels of importance.

These people have destroyed and run-down Zimbabwe. If they want to run Zimbabwe they must sort out their mess on their own and not drag every Zimbabwe down with them. Robert Mugabe’s ouster as the leader of ZANU PF first and as the President of Zimbabwe should be resolved inside his party. ZANU PF should be able to replace him through constitutional means and then continue until the next election is held.

Zimbabwe has waited for a long time to have this man ousted and for an open election to be held. Why would anyone in their right sense of mind want to spoil the party by forming unholy alliances with the devil?

What is the opposition afraid of?

Honestly, this coup can only be celebrated to the extent it has helped ZANU PF succession battles but it cannot and is not a panacea to Zimbabwe’s deep-seated politico – economic problems.

The election in 2018 should decide who will finally democratically lead Zimbabwe after Robert Gabriel Mugabe!

No! to direct or indirect rule by the military in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe cannot be another Burma. The military are of the misguided view that they can turn Zimbabwe into a mini China of sorts. It can’t!

Zimbabwe! Calling others gay, barking dogs & mafikizolos will not solve Command Ugly Cultures

2 Jul

So, it goes in ZANU PF that if your erstwhile and yesteryear Dinyane colleagues irritate you, you label them gay, you call them mafikozolos, you call them deserters, barking dogs and all sorts of nasty names. This all in the hope that the name calling should end their tirades on twitter and wherever they exercise their misdemeanors against the revolutionary party. This sort of diversionary tactic would have worked back then, years ago, but it seems no one ever bothered to tell Cde Constantino Guveya Chiwenga, Minister Chinamasa, Vice President Mnangagwa, Nathaniel and Ambassador Mutsvangwa that they should look for new tactics as this one is now less diversionary, tired and boring. It is understandable that these comrades would have been immensely irritated by the twitter rants by Jonathan Moyo and jabs by Savior Kasukuwere about the Command Agriculture saga. Honestly, after hatching such a good looting plan who would expect that even the beneficiaries of such a thieving scheme would oppose it. For me, it is not even the rantings by Proff. Jonso and Tyson that are the problem here. It is rather the lousy and near violent responses by these top ZANU PF officials which point to a refusal to be censured, and a lazy attitude that the country should be governed by Command policies. The rantings by Chinamasa, Mutsvangwa, Chiwenga and Mnangagwa as well as the (re) tired Cde Nathaniel reveal the smelly underbelly of the Command Agriculture scheme more than it dissuades critics and observers from asking objective questions.

That someone had to find a way to fund, subsidize or bankroll the cash strapped farmers who got land from the land grab that happened over a decade ago is beyond doubt. Banks have refused and continue to ask questions about the bankability of the 99 year leases. Government is forcing the banks to charge 4% interest rates. This was bound to be a recipe for disaster, still someone had to cough up the cash to supply inputs for the farmers to start farming without too many stringent conditions. So, in comes Dr Grace with the Command Agriculture Scheme. It is said farmers who could prove that they could farm, were operating close to water sources and had irrigation equipment etc. were allowed access to the inputs which would be collected from GMB. Farmers collected their inputs and went to farm. There is no question about this, somehow funds were needed for agricultural revival in Zimbabwe. This money had to be provided and yes, the Government intervened and provided the much-needed support.

Questions came in as soon as the Command Agriculture project started. Rightful questions which needed and still need forthright answers. For me, this is where the Lacoste team misses the point and fails to address the information needs of Zimbabweans including Proff. Jonso and Tyson. Of course, it known to all and sundry that Jonso and Tyson and ohh yes muzukuru wa sekuru Mu Rasta are not asking questions because they are worried about Zimbabwe. The problem that finds the Lacoste team in sixes and nines and make their responses childish is that they are failing to deploy intelligent responses and the right people to respond to the tirades from Jonso and his G 40.

First, who names a policy as big as this agricultural finance scheme “Command Agriculture”. It is as if we are in some Soviet Stalinist era or Nyerere’s socialist era. Yes, the process is in every way Command like, but it could have been given a name – a Zimbabwean title for that matter, to give it dignity, a home and belonging. But alas some douche bag cleverly thought it could be called “Command”. By calling this process “Command” it opened it up to ridicule and all these unnecessary proceedings from the likes of Proff. Jonso and his G40 and now they should manage to eclipse this whole process as “Command Ugly Culture”.

Secondly, questions have been asked about the transparency with which this process has been implemented. For God’s sake, if everything is above aboard and there is nothing to hide, why would it be difficult for Chinamasa, Chiwenga and the King Crocodile himself to simply issue a spreadsheet showing who got what inputs, when and what value they were. Is it that difficult? Jonathan Moyo can continue playing his trumpet so loud and for so long because he knows most probably that the people managing this process do not even know what inputs he received.

I raise the point of inventory above because it would be able to answer a follow up question on what outputs were achieved by each farmer. It is a simple evaluation process. If x amount of inputs were given to Farmer Jonso with all things being equal (rains, fuel, labor etc.), Farmer Jonso would have produced so much tonnage isn’t it. Exact figures might be difficult to come up with for the final output but at least estimates can be drawn up. Team Lacoste continues to play around with the mantra that Command Agriculture produced a bumper harvest and Zimbabwe will for the first time in a long period not require to import grains. Well, fair and fine, but this response fails to answer critical questions on what farmer produced what products and in what quantities. This kind of knee jerk response does not provide for a future looking government and policy making process. What farmers did well, which regions and all those sorts of questions are critical questions that need ready answers from the Minister of Agriculture and GMB. The idea that Zimbabweans can be Commanded to believe that the Command Agriculture project was a success without seeing clearly tabulated results is so Commandist and so yesterday. Word of advice for Ngwena – please get a bit more sophisticated and have the boys in your office do more work. Maybe the politicians can be allowed the ranting but certainly the task force Commanded by you to manage this process can and could have done better in terms of providing clearer information.

Third, the name Sakunda Holdings continues to be tossed around as the funders of this project. The newspapers run around with information that these “petrol” people are somehow related to the first family and mukwasha Simba. Whichever way it is, I see arrogance on the part of the Lacoste team in the way they respond. If nothing is amiss with these funds and this company then clearly someone clever enough would have responded intelligently and given accounts of what funds were agreed to be lended to the Government of Zimbabwe, at what interest rates, for what period, disbursed in what procedures etc. This information is not coming through and what Zimbabweans get daily are allegations of corrupt dealings, inflated interest rates, fake disbursements etc. Even if Team Lacoste wanted to take over the government and run the state after the demise of the Great One, I believe it would be cleverer to have a more responsive press officer, a more able manager of information, not these hocus pocus responses from Chinamasa. It’s just not cutting it!

The arrogance with which the Team Lacoste has responded and continues to soldier on Commanding more funds for Command Livestock and Command Fisheries just shows poor politicking on the Team Lacoste. I reckon the proceeds from Command Agriculture were so sweet that people want to continue mauling the fiscus before the old man kicks the bucket. Ngwena and Chinamasa could as well try to up their game before implanting Command Livestock and Fisheries. This idea of Commandeering everything even information is not working.

The use of expletives and foul language to respond to criticism to Jonso and Tyson is counterproductive for Team Lacoste. What such responses do is reveal an arrogant stance that Zimbabwe belongs to ZANU PF and the only thing that this side of ZANU PF needs to be worried about is the G40 faction and nothing and no one else. Zimbabwe is much bigger than Team G 40 and Jonso. Team Lacoste get a life and stop responding with jibes that Jonso and Tyson are gay. Unless of course Command Sexuality was introduced and we were not told. It is very clear that the idea is to try whip up emotions of Zimbabweans on sexual orientation debates and because President Mugabe is adamant that “gays are worse than pigs”. Zimbabweans know this and it is a bit futile for Team Lacoste to want to appeal to President Mugabe in this manner. If these attacks are going to be made, at least let them come from elsewhere. For once, Team Lacoste has a chance to speak policy and respond in a clean and sober manner on questions regarding the funding of Command Agriculture. That Jonso deserted the war is also well known. But frankly, who really knows how the fought was fought when there are so many disputed narratives. Joice never fell any helicopter, so and so was just a mujibha, so and so was just a cook etc. That so and so joined ZANU PF later does not necessarily mean that they cannot ask questions when the revolutionary party implements questionable policies. Commanding allegiance through Command policies such as Command Agriculture, Command Livestock and Command Fisheries will only work for if the money lasts. After the money is finished, it will be back to square one. Policy questions asked today will still be there waiting to be answered

All Zimbabweans want to know is how exactly those who have been given inputs under the Command Agriculture will repay their loans. This process that farmers will pay back with grain at 75% or whatever quantity is well and clear. Mnangagwa has noted that farmers are already depositing grains at various GMB depots. It would be good for whoever is monitoring and evaluating Zim Asset and this Command Agriculture process to keep Zimbabweans updated on an online portal, throught the Herald and whatever means about the state of affairs with this Command Agriculture process. The idea of having policies discussed via twitter by Jonso and Cde Pats ranting in private newspapers is not working!

In any case, if ZimAsset is going to proceed by way of COMMAND economics and funding, then when will see COMMAND HOUSING, command ROADS and COMMAND STOP CORRUPTION at ZIMRA and from the boys in blue whose boss wears the wrong shoe sizes to work!

Last word for Sakunda Holdings and all these other people enjoying lending money to this government. I note as well the Afreximbank loan to fund the bond notes. I noted earlier, that someone somewhere has and had to fund the different projects under Zimasset. These projects have very high returns at the moment, they are quite interesting but I sincerely hope that they will not one day become odious debts. Just saying! Remember, the Guptas down South – hint hint! Just one day, gava richadimbura musungo Sakunda!

UGLY as this whole COMMAND CULTURE looks, Team Lacoste can do better and respond in better ways in a manner that can serve all Zimbabweans. Zimbabwe will not be fed by the jabs between Lacoste and G 40.

%d bloggers like this: