Archive | February, 2012

The Zimbabwe Constituency Development Fund – Much ado about nothing!

25 Feb

In recent weeks there has been a lot of hullabaloo in the local press and political circles around the alleged misuse of the Constituency Development Fund (CDF) by some Members of Parliament. There is no doubt that during the conceptualization of this fund, the policy makers had Zimbabwe’s people and development at heart. This is highly commendable. However, there are a number of issues that I believe were overseen by the policy makers which would have and still make the CDF a – “much ado about nothing”. Honestly, I think the alleged misuse was to be expected and people should not have expected much from the management of these funds by the MPs. My argument precisely being that this animal – the CDF – must not have been created or availed to the MPs in the first place. I have a myriad of reasons to support my stance.

In the first instance, it is quite clear that the Parliament of Zimbabwe and any legislative body has a number of roles which include making law primarily. Other roles such as overseeing the work of the executive, budgetary functions and representing the views of the constituents in Parliament are quite essential. If one were to carry out an audit of the legislative work that has been done by the current Parliament of Zimbabwe to this day, it would show that not much has been done bar the rigors of the constitution making process and the difficult nature of the beast called the Inclusive Government. It then baffles the mind, why the legislature would be given such a laborious and difficult task considering that they are failing to deliver in many aspects of their work.

Secondly, though I stand to be corrected, I believe that the CDF created a conundrum wherein the legislature took over and wrongly assumed an executive role. The fact that the CDF and Parliamentarians are supposed to carry out developmental work is not in doubt. However, the question that begs answers is that Central Government through its ministries has allocations for developmental work. For example the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare manages the Basic Education Assistance Module meant for poor children who need assistance to pay for their tuition. The Ministry of Education has a role to manage schools and make sure that schools’ needs are catered for. Furthermore, a number of donor organizations such as Oxfam have been drilling boreholes in rural and urban areas. So, if there are clear roles for such ministries and civil society groups to carry out this developmental work why was there a need to create this parallel structure?

Others have argued that this structure was meant to evade and or avoid central government bureaucracy. This argument is not convincing enough as it only indicts Central Government to wake up, rise and deal with its lack of management skills. Government bureaucracy cannot be viewed as a beast that is there to stay and cannot be dealt with decisively. In fact it is a disease that government needs to get rid of and pronto for that matter.

The CDF in its nature looks as if it’s a project that was meant to boost the images of MPs in their constituencies and to endear the legislators to the people and not so much about development. Maybe it should have been called the Political Affairs Development Fund. Honestly, it is not clear how a meager $50 000 per constituency will be able to deal with the myriad problems that Zimbabwe and its people are facing. Others have argued that this is a clear case of good devolution mechanisms but in all honesty, this cannot be true. What are the structures that ensure this, how do the constituents present their views to the MP, who chooses what program to implement, who does the procurement, what measures are put in place to ensure that the MP or his cronies do not create their own companies to supply products, how will the evaluation of the projects be done, if there are complaints how will they be dealt with. All this to my understanding is not and has not been made clear to the MPs, constituencies and even to Government itself leading to a vacuum which can and has now allegedly been abused by the MPs.

The current court cases against some of the MPs are a charade which is a mere wastage of taxpayers’ money and will not go anywhere far in terms of getting accountability for the funds. This is because the rules of the game were never made clear from the beginning. I can imagine what some of the MPs will plead in court. It is even hilarious to even think that any of them will be found wanting, judging from the fact that they have already allegedly started “manufacturing” receipts and alibis.

The worthiness of the $50 000 fund is quite relative to the problems in a given constituency. Some constituencies will find this money quite helpful to fix their children’s school chairs and desks, and other constituents whose areas have had no water for ages will gratefully accept this money to drill boreholes and so on. On the contrary, others who have bigger problems will think this as a scoff from government because the money will just be a drop in the ocean considering the extent of their economic and social problems. However, for government to hood wink people and say that this money is meant for development, employment creation and so on is just not serious!

Way forward

The question that needs answers now is what to do with the MPs who have allegedly been found wanting. There has been talk around town that the Minister of Constitutional and Parliamentary Affairs Eric Matinenga  is allegedly practicing a scorched earth policy wherein he wants to bring down anyone who is found on his wrong side as he exits politics back to his noble profession. Others have argued that he wants to leave politics with a bang and a lasting legacy that he was an apt leader who would not tolerate corruption. If this were true, the idea of instilling a corruption free government by the Minister remains a noble one and he must be commended.

At a political level however, the Minister’s strategy could backfire as I do not see anything to be gained by the MDC by eating its own children in this manner. The dead silence by ZANU PF on this matter is telling of a party that does not want to be embroiled in unnecessary nonsense although it is well known by all and sundry that they cannot be trusted when their hands are allowed into the pot.

I cannot fathom a situation where someone like Lucia Matibenga or Sekai Holland could “chow” public funds and be corrupt. I just cannot believe it. Others have argued that “munhu haarambirwe – that people can never be trusted or vouched for. I beg to differ. The alleged abusers of these funds must be given a chance to explain themselves first. This strategy will only serve to destabilize the MDC T and even ZANU PF further and leave a number of MPs scathed unnecessarily. People can also ask whether such talk is advocacy for corruption and impunity. Clearly not, I say. However, I think these matters can be resolved in other ways other than seeking judicial remedies. The Minister obviously has nothing to lose whichever course he takes. However, the Minister needs to engage the fingered MPs and their constituents and come up with a solution that will not leave egg on anyone’s face. For the political parties who have been fingered especially the MDC T, for it being a “peoples’ party” it needs to go to Harvest House, sit down with its MPs and get its house and papers (receipts, vouchers, etc) in order and present these to Minister Matinenga in due course!

There are a number of countries such as Kenya which have taken up this model of the CDF since 2003. The Kenya CDF policy has had its ups and downs but I do not think that Zimbabwe is ready for such a process yet. In the final analysis, it would be more beneficial to have these funds allocated to central bodies in the various ministries and have constituents led by committees  comprising the MPs, councilors and other local leaders represent their needs to such bodies. Without this, what will we have next – Senators asking for their own Senatorial Development Fund, Councilors asking for their own Council Development Funds and Chiefs asking for their own Traditional Leaders Development Funds?

This policy needs to be stopped immediately and reviewed. Those who have been indicted before the courts or have been asked by the Minister must just account properly at the end of the day. There is no need for arrogance or thinking that this is about witch hunting. “If people ate the money they must just account for it”. We do not want to have the nonsense of President  Zuma’s Spokesperson Mac Maharaj, who when he was asked by the media if he had received bribes from Shabir Schaik and some of his associates in the arms deal scandal in South Africa he kept arguing that the media was infringing his privacy and would sue but kept refusing to answer the simple question on whether he had received the money or not. While the idea remains great and noble, the Parliament of Zimbabwe and its members will not be the best channel to use these funds.

Advertisements

Xenophobia and Violence as youth economic empowerment tools: Misplaced priorities for Zimbabwe

15 Feb

The recent renewed calls for foreign business persons to leave Zimbabwe and have their businesses taken over by indigenous Zimbabweans are at the least misplaced and at worst highly misinformed. These calls are definitely nothing new and are a wicked extension  of  the chaotic indigenization process that first started with the 2000 land  invasions led ZANU PF.  Having witnessed the violence that engulfed Bulawayo and Harare in 2011 perpetrated by young ZANU PF party zealots, I am inclined to note that these actions are futile and irrational. This purported empowerment drive spearheaded by Zimbabwean young men and women is flawed for a number of reasons. In the end I argue that these unlawful actions must be stopped by the Zimbabwean government forthwith. Firstly, the idea that the Zimbabwean youth can be economically empowered by attacking and invading businesses owned by Nigerian, Pakistani and Indian nationals will not yield results. This is for the simple reason that most of these so called youths are mere hooligans who have no clue about running any business. These youths are being misled to believe that the retail sector and businesses owned by the foreigners are the most lucrative. Why are they not being told to take over companies that are in the construction, food or other industries. Young people need to be dissuaded from approaching life using this quick money making approach that has engulfed Zimbabwe. Even if these youths were to have access to the businesses that mainly specialize in motor vehicle spare parts, cheap clothing and home electricals, it would be nearly impossible for them to stock them up as they do not have the capital to stock these shops. Most of the goods are acquired from the Far East and Arab countries such as Dubai and China and God knows where these youths will raise airfares and other resources to keep these businesses running. Of course, I have no doubt that given expert advice these young people would be able to run these businesses but strongly doubt these “comrades” who have been protesting would be able to do any good beyond meting out the violence they are hired to deliver to the doorsteps of these foreigners. Secondly, I think the idea of invading the businesses by the youth and cancelling the operating licenses for these businesses by the gvernment only deals with the symptoms of the problem. It is alleged that property owners who are mainly of a foreign origin and even some Zimbabwean nationals have been charging exorbitant rentals in the form of “Goodwill deposits” ranging from $5 000 to $10 000 to get access to small rooms and shops for retail. This kind of speculation by property owners in Harare and some cities in Zimbabwe has led to the almost alienation of many a Zimbabwean entrepreneur who would want to engage in such businesses as those operated by the foreign nationals. Therein lies the problem – Zimbabwean nationals are now arguing that the Government must protect such industries as the retail sector from the so called foreigners. This is most ludicrous. My argument is that cancelling the licenses does not deal with the problem. The government and local authorities have a moral duty to step in to end such madness and protect not just Zimbabwean locals but even foreign nationals who might want to engage in retail trading in Zimbabwe. It certainly must be criminal for any property owner to charge such exorbitant fees citing fear of defaulting on the part of the lessee. There are clear laws that speak to tenant –lessee relations and these can be invoked in Zimbabwean courts of law if ever any of the parties were to default. A diligent enforcement and investigation of this and other related matters by the relevant authorities with assistance from other relevant parties such as representatives of the entrepreneurs should be able to solve this problem amicably. On a more serious and moral note, I find it deplorable that Zimbabwean government officials have remained mum when foreign nationals have been attacked over the running of these businesses. The actions exhibited by the youths are highly xenophobic and potentially lethal. Zimbabwe need not be reminded of the xenophobic attacks in South Africa on Zimbabweans some three years ago. The attacks on the Nigerians on Kaguvi Street, the Indians in down town Harare and other foreign nationals will not aid the indigenization or youth empowerment drive in any way. What will it be next then:  raiding the homes of these brothers in the affluent suburbs they live in, chasing their children from the affluent schools they go to, stopping them from going to upmarket clinics and hospitals, what,  what,  what… this madness must just stop. Infact, it is legally and morally wrong for the government of Zimbabwe to offer visas, residence permits and even operating licenses to these foreigners and pretend to feign ignorance when they are being attacked by these so called youths. If the Government of Zimbabwe feels that it does not want foreign nationals to engage in retail trade then this must be made clear to all and sundry through Zimbabwe’s embassies abroad, on the Government’s website and whatever medium so as to dissuade these so called “investors” from coming to Zimbabwe. It is funny to notice that the foreigners that have been targeted thus far remain fellow Africans from Nigeria. So much for African Brotherhood! Government Crying foul There has been an argument that the government is not benefitting in any way by the presence of these foreign nationals’ businesses in Zimbabwe. However, one is tempted to contend that the Zimbabwean government’s incapacity and inability to collect what is due to it is of its own creation. Efficient measures should be put in place to ensure that the have policies that are fit for purpose to deal with revenue collection. For instance, a less corrupt and more efficient system of customs duty regulations would ensure that these foreign businesses would pay proper import duty charges than what they are currently paying. Instead of punishing Zimbabweans who would have crossed the borders and bought themselves goods not meant for resell such as shoes and clothing, the government must find better ways of raising revenue. Moreover instead of the revenue ending up in customs officers pockets, it would contribute to government revenue helping it to create jobs and not this ludicrous idea of wanting to purportedly every youth to be a “businessman”. I am quite sure that if these foreign businesses pay other taxes, it will only be for window dressing. I would want to know what system is used by the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority to collect taxes such as VAT from these companies. Clearly assumptions are dangerous and could be misleading but I would take a hunch that the majority of these companies do not remit these taxes because of the porousness of the tax collection system and abuse by corrupt Zimbabwe Revenue Authority officials. Clearly, the Zimbabwean government is trying to solve the problem of youth unemployment and economic unemployment using a muddling through approach largely informed by illegal and vindictive actions. These in the end will not be beneficial to the scores of youth hired to be angry on behalf of the government and to the generality of Zimbabwean young people. My call is for the government to find other ways of dealing with these foreign business people such as efficient tax collection measures to raise the much needed revenue which they are failing to get from them at the moment. More importantly, the government needs to find money to inject into the economy so that more new jobs can be created to absorb the largely increasing young Zimbabwean population. A dosage of good governance that would ease the stringent conditions enforced by International lenders and a more transparent deployment of revenue from the Chiadzwa diamond sales could and will definitely ease such lacuna. Zimbabwean young people need to wake up and smell the coffee as well, no wealth gained through violence, vindictiveness and unfairness to other human beings will never bring them economic empowerment and prosperity.

Hello world!

15 Feb

Welcome to WordPress.com. After you read this, you should delete and write your own post, with a new title above. Or hit Add New on the left (of the admin dashboard) to start a fresh post.

Here are some suggestions for your first post.

  1. You can find new ideas for what to blog about by reading the Daily Post.
  2. Add PressThis to your browser. It creates a new blog post for you about any interesting  page you read on the web.
  3. Make some changes to this page, and then hit preview on the right. You can always preview any post or edit it before you share it to the world.
%d bloggers like this: